Vivold Consulting

Why it is vital that you understand the infrastructure behind AI

Key Insights

An exploration of AI infrastructure decisions, highlighting DeepSeek's efficient model as a case study.

Stay Updated

Get the latest insights delivered to your inbox

Understanding AI infrastructure is crucial as businesses strive to implement effective AI strategies amidst rising demand and vast resource needs.

Key Considerations in AI Deployment

- Infrastructure choices: computing power, data storage, chip selection, energy efficiency
- Department-specific needs: AI solutions vary by function, requiring tailored infrastructure

Critical Components

- AI compute – determines performance
- Data centers – on-site, leased, modular, or cloud-based; impact on scalability, security, and latency
- Cloud services – flexibility from hyperscalers (Amazon, Microsoft), but risk of vendor lock-in
- Hybrid models – combine proprietary and cloud infrastructure for customization and resilience
- Specialized setups – co-location and edge computing for specific performance or sovereignty needs

Technological Advancements

- Hardware: GPUs, TPUs, neuromorphic chips improving efficiency and performance
- High-bandwidth memory: addresses data bottlenecks

Challenges

- Sustainability and energy demands – data centers consume substantial power
- Cooling and power sourcing innovations – crucial for future scalability

Industry Trends

> “Smaller, efficient AI models can deliver strong performance.”

- Example: China’s DeepSeek shows the potential of efficient models to shift focus from high-capacity approaches
- Greater accessibility for businesses with limited resources

Success Factors

- Compatibility
- Flexibility
- Pace of adoption

Related Articles

An AWS knowledge-graph deployment turned 6-month research cycles into 3 weeks - and the blueprint transfers far beyond pharma

An AWS GraphRAG deployment in pharmaceutical research cut R&D cycles by 87% - initial discovery that took six months now closes in three weeks - by fusing siloed internal databases and public literature into one queryable knowledge graph on Amazon Neptune Analytics and Bedrock (running Claude). Every answer comes with verifiable citations and a mapped reasoning path, which is exactly what regulated industries need for compliance. The architecture is modular and, crucially, transferable: any enterprise drowning in fragmented legacy data can copy this pattern.

SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI listings will out-value every US VC-backed exit since 2000 - reshaping vendor economics for everyone

The new NVCA-Pitchbook Venture Monitor dropped a stunning claim: the pending OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs, together with SpaceX's listing, will generate more value than every US VC-backed exit since 2000 combined. SpaceX is already public at $1.77 trillion, and with both AI labs pushing toward trillion-dollar debuts, the trio should land north of $4 trillion - against roughly $70 billion in total US IPO proceeds last year. For anyone buying AI services, the labs' shift to public-market scrutiny will reshape pricing, transparency, and vendor stability.

A 14-person open-source team just became the default way 8.9M developers run local AI - and a lever for slashing inference bills

Ollama, the open-source tool that lets developers run open-weight AI models on their own machines in minutes, raised a $65M Series B led by Theory Ventures ($88M total), revealing it now serves 8.9 million developers monthly and sits inside 85% of the Fortune 500 - with just 14 employees. Founders Jeff Morgan and Michael Chiang previously built Docker Desktop, and they're repeating the play: abstract away the hardware pain, then monetise a cloud tier priced on GPU time rather than tokens. The backdrop is the industry's loudest cost debate: every company with heavy inference bills is under existential pressure to shift routine workloads to open models.