Vivold Consulting
Business & Enterprise

Results from the first Anthropic Public Record

Americans want AI's cures but fear the job losses - and only 15% trust AI companies

Key Insights

Anthropic's first Public Record survey polled nearly 52,000 Americans on their hopes and fears about AI, finding broad, bipartisan demand for government oversight. Job loss (64%) topped every state's worry list while curing disease (48%) led the hopes - yet just 15% said they trust AI companies to steer the technology. Notably, daily AI users were consistently less fearful than non-users.

Stay Updated

Get the latest insights delivered to your inbox

America's AI mood: hopeful, anxious, and short on trust

Anthropic ran a nationally representative survey of nearly 52,000 Americans (fielded in late 2025) to map how the public - not just Claude users - feels about AI. The headline: people are eager for the upside but nervous about the disruption, and they want the companies building AI held accountable.

What people hope for

Asked to pick their top three hopes from a list of 17, respondents led with curing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's (48%), followed by helping people with disabilities (36%), then general technological progress and convenience. A telling detail: hopes that AI might substitute for human contact - therapy, easing loneliness - ranked lowest.

What people fear

The fears skew near-term and concrete rather than science-fiction:

  • Job loss was the runaway top concern at 64%, and it topped the list in every single state.

  • Close behind sat cognitive dependency - losing the ability to think for yourself - at 56%.

  • Then came misinformation, at 52%.

Interestingly, Americans worried more about AI misuse (criminal use, surveillance, terrorism) than about AI "going rogue."

The usage paradox

One of the most striking patterns: hands-on familiarity cools the fear. People who use AI daily at work were notably less worried about job loss (54% vs. 70% for non-users) and dependency (46% vs. 62%). Whether that's because using the tools reveals their limits, or because early adopters are simply sunnier, is an open question - but the gap is large and consistent.

Another counterintuitive twist: cognitive dependency looks more anticipatory than real. Of those worried about it, only about a fifth said they'd feel significant disruption if AI vanished tomorrow - actually lower than among people who claim not to worry about it.

The trust deficit, and what voters want done about it

Here's the number that should sober every lab, Anthropic included: just 15% of Americans trust AI companies to make decisions about how the technology is built and used - the lowest of any institution tested, well behind independent experts (43%).

  • Over 70% want government involved in regulating AI, a bipartisan supermajority that holds in every state.

  • They most want action on privacy, child safety, and liability for harm.

  • Asked how to keep AI beneficial, the top picks were holding companies legally liable (47%) and prioritizing safety over growth (44%).

Why Anthropic is publishing this

The survey is part of a broader push - alongside Anthropic Interviewer and the Economic Index - to fold public input into AI development, and it dovetails with the policy frameworks Anthropic released just days earlier. The subtext is pointed: if the public barely trusts AI firms to govern themselves, the case for outside guardrails rather writes itself. Anthropic plans to repeat the survey and eventually expand beyond the US.

More in Business & Enterprise

All Business & Enterprise stories

Nadella's warning: you're paying for AI twice - once in tokens, once in your own IP

In a blog post, Satya Nadella warned that enterprises using proprietary AI models are paying twice - once in money for tokens, and again in the proprietary knowledge they must reveal to make those models useful, since models learn from the 'exhaust' of prompts, tool use, and especially corrections. He argued it is inconsistent for labs to claim fair-use rights to train on the world's public data while restricting others from distilling their models in return. Nadella - whose company invests in both OpenAI and Anthropic - later doubled down on CNN, saying firms without their own models or an AI gateway layer separating prompts, memory, and harness from the model won't survive as firms, having 'outsourced your thinking.'

Amazon retires Mechanical Turk: the platform that secretly powered 'AI' for 21 years is done

Amazon will close Mechanical Turk to new customers on July 30, 2026, moving the 21-year-old crowdsourcing marketplace into maintenance mode with no new features - and reporting indicates SageMaker Ground Truth and Amazon Augmented AI close to new customers the same day. Launched in 2005 as 'artificial artificial intelligence,' MTurk annotated the data that trained a generation of models; by 2023 a study found 33-46% of its workers were using LLMs to do the tasks, dissolving the platform's reason to exist. If your research, labeling, or human-review pipeline touches MTurk, you now have a migration deadline.

Zuckerberg's candid admission: AI agents 'haven't accelerated the way we expected'

At an internal town hall on July 2, Mark Zuckerberg told employees that AI agent development over the last four months has not accelerated as expected, that Meta's sweeping reorganisation was not as clean as it could have been, and that its bets on the new structure have not yet paid off - remarks first reported by Reuters from a recording. The admission stings because Meta laid off about 10% of its workforce and reassigned ~7,000 people to AI teams in May, with executives who planned the reorg reportedly optimistic about tools like Claude Code. Zuckerberg still expects significant AI benefits within three to six months - but the gap between agent hype and agent reality just got named by its biggest spender.